<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy Major</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cell Phone Ring Tones</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell Phone Ring Tones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 22:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cell Phone Ring Tones...&lt;/strong&gt;

You have a great site keep it up..thx bro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cell Phone Ring Tones&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You have a great site keep it up..thx bro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quite Random &#187; Concentration and my perfect job</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Quite Random &#187; Concentration and my perfect job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m quite chuffed to find out that I should be a journalist, according to the fifteenth psychometric test I&#8217;ve done this month &#8211; results from these tests are rarely revelations, but they can give you useful confirmation that you&#8217;re mentally heading in the right direction. I have had enough time to figure out my ideal job: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&rsquo;m quite chuffed to find out that I should be a journalist, according to the fifteenth psychometric test I&rsquo;ve done this month &ndash; results from these tests are rarely revelations, but they can give you useful confirmation that you&rsquo;re mentally heading in the right direction. I have had enough time to figure out my ideal job: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-264</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Mark&lt;/b&gt; - I agree with you completely that poor Descartes statment has become very distorted in pop culture, however, for the puprose of this quiz I think that the author was trying to appeal to that reference.  Yet another piece of evidence to show that this isn't the most scientific of quizzes.  Too bad about your jazz fingers - I think you make a rather witty Thespian!

&lt;b&gt;Nathan&lt;/b&gt; - cute joke!  Funny, but sadly I can totally relate - I can't fix a computer but I can ramble on indefinetely about the possiblity of the computer being conscious or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Mark</b> - I agree with you completely that poor Descartes statment has become very distorted in pop culture, however, for the puprose of this quiz I think that the author was trying to appeal to that reference.  Yet another piece of evidence to show that this isn&#8217;t the most scientific of quizzes.  Too bad about your jazz fingers - I think you make a rather witty Thespian!</p>
<p><b>Nathan</b> - cute joke!  Funny, but sadly I can totally relate - I can&#8217;t fix a computer but I can ramble on indefinetely about the possiblity of the computer being conscious or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Amy, I just realised that your combination of philosophy and computer science was an interesting one... I think I remember a comedian once said he'd done a degree in computer science and psychology, so he couldn't fix a computer, but he knew just how it was feeling when it broke down... 

OK, I'll get my coat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy, I just realised that your combination of philosophy and computer science was an interesting one&#8230; I think I remember a comedian once said he&#8217;d done a degree in computer science and psychology, so he couldn&#8217;t fix a computer, but he knew just how it was feeling when it broke down&#8230; </p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ll get my coat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Yes, good point, "I think, therefore I am" was a pretty obvious selection.  But I ranked it quite low because it is a fallacious inference.  Strickly, from the presmise "I think", the only thing that follows that there "there is a thinking thing".  In fact, in the original latin, its 'cogito, ergo sum',  makes it easier to see this.  Additional work has to be be done to show that I (or you, or anyone else) is identical to the cogito, that is, the thinking.

But yes, there's a lovely Theatre department here.  I could brush up on my Ibsen, and wear black turtle-necks, and be ever so existential in my tastes.  It would be a hoot; but alas, I don't think my jazz-fingers are all that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good point, &#8220;I think, therefore I am&#8221; was a pretty obvious selection.  But I ranked it quite low because it is a fallacious inference.  Strickly, from the presmise &#8220;I think&#8221;, the only thing that follows that there &#8220;there is a thinking thing&#8221;.  In fact, in the original latin, its &#8216;cogito, ergo sum&#8217;,  makes it easier to see this.  Additional work has to be be done to show that I (or you, or anyone else) is identical to the cogito, that is, the thinking.</p>
<p>But yes, there&#8217;s a lovely Theatre department here.  I could brush up on my Ibsen, and wear black turtle-necks, and be ever so existential in my tastes.  It would be a hoot; but alas, I don&#8217;t think my jazz-fingers are all that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Interesting results from both of you!  &lt;b&gt;Nathan&lt;/b&gt; - I can see why you scored so high for  Journalism as you are a great writer and I have had many laughs reading both your daily and travel blogs.  &lt;b&gt;Mark&lt;/b&gt; - does Cornell have a Theatre department you can transfer to? LOL - I honestly cannot believe that you scored so low in philosophy and so high in Theatre and Biology, esp. when the philosophy oriented questions were pretty clich√É¬© ("I think therefore I am" is one that comes to mind).   I don't think that this quiz is very scientific or balanced (or recent since it doesn√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t even list CS as a major) and even though I'm pretty happy with my results I would by no means use this test to make or evaluate any life choices!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting results from both of you!  <b>Nathan</b> - I can see why you scored so high for  Journalism as you are a great writer and I have had many laughs reading both your daily and travel blogs.  <b>Mark</b> - does Cornell have a Theatre department you can transfer to? LOL - I honestly cannot believe that you scored so low in philosophy and so high in Theatre and Biology, esp. when the philosophy oriented questions were pretty clich√É¬© (&#8221;I think therefore I am&#8221; is one that comes to mind).   I don&#8217;t think that this quiz is very scientific or balanced (or recent since it doesn√¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t even list CS as a major) and even though I&#8217;m pretty happy with my results I would by no means use this test to make or evaluate any life choices!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Below are my results.  Either I'm making a terrible, terrible mistake with my life, or something up with the nature of the quiz. :)

----
You scored as Anthropology.  	
You should be an Anthropology major!

Theater 100%
Chemistry 100%
Biology 100%
Mathematics 100%
Linguistics 100%
Engineering 100%
Sociology 100%
Psychology 100%
Anthropology 100%
English 100%
Dance 92%
Journalism 83%
Art 75%
Philosophy 67%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below are my results.  Either I&#8217;m making a terrible, terrible mistake with my life, or something up with the nature of the quiz. :)</p>
<p>&#8212;-<br />
You scored as Anthropology.<br />
You should be an Anthropology major!</p>
<p>Theater 100%<br />
Chemistry 100%<br />
Biology 100%<br />
Mathematics 100%<br />
Linguistics 100%<br />
Engineering 100%<br />
Sociology 100%<br />
Psychology 100%<br />
Anthropology 100%<br />
English 100%<br />
Dance 92%<br />
Journalism 83%<br />
Art 75%<br />
Philosophy 67%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/2006/03/07/philosophy-major/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amyallcock.com/blog/?p=79#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Journalism 100% 
Psychology 92%
Sociology 83%
Theater 83%
Biology 75%
English 75%
Linguistics 75%
Engineering 75%
Philosophy 75%
Anthropology 67%
Chemistry 58%
Dance 50%
Art 50%
Mathematics 42%


This is me (hope it comes out)... mathematics coming at the bottom is no surprise, but I might have given more weight to philosophy... ah well, that's why you do these tests I suppose, the attempt to show empirically how your head works, just in case your own opinion is no use!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalism 100%<br />
Psychology 92%<br />
Sociology 83%<br />
Theater 83%<br />
Biology 75%<br />
English 75%<br />
Linguistics 75%<br />
Engineering 75%<br />
Philosophy 75%<br />
Anthropology 67%<br />
Chemistry 58%<br />
Dance 50%<br />
Art 50%<br />
Mathematics 42%</p>
<p>This is me (hope it comes out)&#8230; mathematics coming at the bottom is no surprise, but I might have given more weight to philosophy&#8230; ah well, that&#8217;s why you do these tests I suppose, the attempt to show empirically how your head works, just in case your own opinion is no use!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

